Monday, December 1, 2014

Managing Your Classroom!

As a student teacher, I am constantly learning new ways to be a professional educator. This past week in our classrooms, we learned three methods to controlling a classroom and establishing behavior. As a teacher, maintaining a well-behaved and orderly class is the first step to providing great instruction. If the flow of pedagogy is constantly interrupted by a student's cell phone going off, an off topic discussion, or any classroom disruption, try out some of these methods.

Assertive Discipline
I grew up in a Catholic High School. The instructors commonly had a rubber ruler on hand or a yard stick just in case one of us started talking out of line or falling asleep. It wasn't uncommon to hear "the man" coming down on the desk of a dozing student, one because the old nuns were pretty good at making that wooden ruler snap and two because everyone was scared silent. The Assertive Discipline method requires that an educator clearly define expectations and standards to the students and act in a direct way when those standards are not being met. There is a clear procedure to the consequences of breaking the rules such as the "three strikes" rule or what I call the "levels of hell" i.e. light consequences for the first few infractions and gradually increasing. Teachers might also use logical consequences, or rather punishment suited to the crime.


The FAIR Approach
In stark contrast to the above method, the FAIR approach recognizes the individual student and suggests to educators that they take a more personal method to dealing with disruptive behavior. Maybe the student has a learning disability? Perhaps the student has family or bully problems. Whatever the case, in order for teachers to properly diagnose and address the problem they must first (1) understand the Function or cause of the behavior. (2) Make Accommodations. (3) Interact and show the students are valued. (4) Respond to students who improve behavior. This approach puts the students first.


Self-managed Communities
If the Assertive Discipline method is akin to that of a dictatorship or monarchy where it is the one's rules whom all abide to, then the Self-Managed Communities is the opposite. This method puts the responsibility of handling the class almost entirely to the discretion of the students. An educator will begin by explaining ground rules for the class and expectations for a regular class meeting. At these class meetings, it is up to the students to evaluate the classroom behavior status and come up with solutions to any conflicts that arise, whether it be changing or enforcing rules that they themselves create. The teacher takes a backseat, intervening only when necessary and being more of a facilitator than a dictator. This method would be more like a Democractic Republic, where the teacher is the overseeing government, but the students the individual states.



I am not confident at this point over whether or not I can manage a classroom. However, it helps knowing that I have a few more tools under my belt in case the situation arises.

Staff Development Day #1: Teaching Teachers How To Teach

         There were a few days besides holidays that I looked forward to when I went to school. One was assembly days because we would get shorter class periods and an hour of sitting in the bleachers watching student council do something odd or (once I got my drivers license) just an open hour after school. Another day was a snow day...something I haven't had since I moved out here from Jersey to Vegas. The final day was Staff Development Days - the days when kids had off but teachers still had to go to work for some reason.

          Now I am a teacher, and from around the block I hear that staff development days were the dreaded days for the staff at any school. "They pay people to come in and teach us how to teach," say some begrudged educators. As part of my student-teacher experience, I decided to drop in for these staff development days, a two day experience, and what I saw was...well....

         Alright, day one pretty much sucked. I could only bear it for three hours out of the eight. First, teachers from around the area were herded into the school and then separated by subject area into separate "pens". I joined the English "sheep" in the theater, and there I witnessed some sort of crude irony unfold before my eyes. Here were teachers, infamous for putting students to sleep with boring lectures about seemingly interesting content, falling asleep themselves to another  very pronounced teacher. I hardly remember what was discussed, or rather what I heard (there was not much interaction though the presenter promised it), but I did walk away with a few things, mostly thoughts about the experience:

1.       Teachers are people just like the students

In more ways than one I thought teachers were from a different world when I was growing up. However, I realized that while sitting in that room trying to keep myself awake and watching other teachers doing the same these teachers were students once and they knew the pains of being bored. As teachers we try to engage in our students and become an exciting but educational part of their lives. The effort gets tiring, especially after several years.

2.       Teachers are employees, not superheroes (or mutants)

Just another way of saying takeaway #1 above, but I realize that so much work gets done behind closed school doors. Good teachers are constantly trying to up their game. They weren't born teachers, but rather they work hard at what they do by planning and attending staff development days.

3.       This is how you get your students to not remember anything

Lectures suck. Seriously. Your lecture better be fantastic if you are going to do one.
Overall, I'm probably being a bit harsh. It was a Monday and I didn't get to see my students. Additionally I was just irked because I was maybe expecting something more out of the staff development day because I was a fresh face. I can understand if most teachers who have been doing this for years might seem put-off by the idea of additional training, but even I was a bit taken aback by the seemingly lack of energy not just from the audience but from the presenter.

Of course, this was just day one. I'm happy to say that day two was much MUCH better.